killingdruid/gitea
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix issue label deletion with Actions tokens (#37013)

Browse Source 
Use shared repo permission resolution for Actions task users in issue
label remove and clear paths, and add a regression test for deleting
issue labels with a Gitea Actions token.

This fixes issue label deletion when the request is authenticated with a
Gitea Actions token.
Fixes #37011 

The bug was that the delete path re-resolved repository permissions
using the normal user permission helper, which does not handle Actions
task users. As a result, `DELETE
/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/labels/{id}` could return
`500` for Actions tokens even though label listing and label addition
worked.

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This commit is contained in:
Nicolas
2026-03-29 11:21:14 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent a1b0bffd0c
commit db7eb4d51b
61 changed files with 268 additions and 181 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
routers/api/v1/repo/collaborators.go
View File

@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ func GetRepoPermissions(ctx *context.APIContext) {
return
}
permission, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository, collaborator)
permission, err := access_model.GetIndividualUserRepoPermission(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository, collaborator)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return

2
routers/api/v1/repo/fork.go
View File

@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ func ListForks(ctx *context.APIContext) {
apiForks := make([]*api.Repository, len(forks))
for i, fork := range forks {
permission, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, fork, ctx.Doer)
permission, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, fork, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return

2
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment.go
View File

@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ func isXRefCommentAccessible(ctx stdCtx.Context, user *user_model.User, c *issue
if err != nil {
return false
}
perm, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, c.RefRepo, user)
perm, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, c.RefRepo, user)
if err != nil {
return false
}

6
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_dependency.go
View File

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ func GetIssueDependencies(ctx *context.APIContext) {
perm = existPerm
} else {
var err error
perm, err = access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, &blocker.Repository, ctx.Doer)
perm, err = access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, &blocker.Repository, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ func GetIssueBlocks(ctx *context.APIContext) {
perm = existPerm
} else {
var err error
perm, err = access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, &depMeta.Repository, ctx.Doer)
perm, err = access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, &depMeta.Repository, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ func getPermissionForRepo(ctx *context.APIContext, repo *repo_model.Repository)
return &ctx.Repo.Permission
}
perm, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, ctx.Doer)
perm, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, repo, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return nil

4
routers/api/v1/repo/pull.go
View File

@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ func parseCompareInfo(ctx *context.APIContext, compareParam string) (result *git
}()
// user should have permission to read baseRepo's codes and pulls, NOT headRepo's
permBase, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, baseRepo, ctx.Doer)
permBase, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, baseRepo, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return nil, nil
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ func parseCompareInfo(ctx *context.APIContext, compareParam string) (result *git
// user should have permission to read headRepo's codes
// TODO: could the logic be simplified if the headRepo is the same as the baseRepo? Need to think more about it.
permHead, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, headRepo, ctx.Doer)
permHead, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, headRepo, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return nil, nil

2
routers/api/v1/repo/pull_review.go
View File

@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ func apiReviewRequest(ctx *context.APIContext, opts api.PullReviewRequestOptions
return
}
permDoer, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, pr.Issue.Repo, ctx.Doer)
permDoer, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, pr.Issue.Repo, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return

4
routers/api/v1/repo/repo.go
View File

@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ func Search(ctx *context.APIContext) {
})
return
}
permission, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, ctx.Doer)
permission, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, repo, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, api.SearchError{
OK: false,
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ func GetByID(ctx *context.APIContext) {
return
}
permission, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, ctx.Doer)
permission, err := access_model.GetDoerRepoPermission(ctx, repo, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return